At RSS on Saturday, Chris started running us through 1 Corinthians – the book we’ll be studying this term. There were loads of great things to take away, even from a general, overview-style session. However, there was one thing in particular that really struck most of us and something which I believe is really pertinent to us right now.
The issue was something Paul addressed in many places, including 1 Corinthians 1:11f.
11 My brothers and sisters, some from Chloe’s household have informed me that there are quarrels among you. 12 What I mean is this: One of you says, “I follow Paul”; another, “I follow Apollos”; another, “I follow Cephas”; still another, “I follow Christ.” 13 Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Were you baptized in the name of Paul?
Essentially, the church in Corinth was dividing itself into factions – people were organising themselves into groups, uniting behind whichever leader or teacher most suited their personal taste.
To be honest, it sounded like a very familiar scenario!
We’re really good at setting up camp. Whether that’s over a political party, a sports team, a genre of music – whatever. The fact is, much of our culture is geared up to encourage us to unite with those who hold to the same things as us, and to divide with those don’t.
What about in church? I see it there too. While Paul refers to the Corinthians, saying “I follow Apollos” or “I follow Paul” or “I follow Peter (Cephas)”; we could just as easily read that as “I follow Piper” or “I follow Johnson” or “I follow Driscoll”. It seems that that basic human instinct of forming into tribes very much has a theological expression as well.
Is there anything wrong with honour and valuing “high profile” leaders and gleaning from them. ABSOLUTELY NOT. In fact, there is much to gain and one of the major blessings of the internet has been making this possible. Apollos, Paul and Cephas were all vital leaders in the church – as are many of the people the Lord has raised up today.
The problem comes when the formation into “teams” moves from being a point of unity with like-minded people, to a point of division with others. If you’re in relationship with someone solely on account of having the same position on something, unfortunately you’re on rocky ground. Sooner or later an issue will crop up that you see differently, and if your unity was based entirely on agreement then it has no other option than to end. You get forced into division.
Often it’s an attitude that can creep in quite subtly. Imagine this: you’re at lifegroup, someone pipes up and gives an opinion, your first thought – “oh that’s just X, they think that because they’re on team Y, I’m not really going to listen, I’m definitely right.” Maybe it wouldn’t be quite such a formed set of judgements, but hopefully you get the idea. We easily (and often unintentionally) judge people, discount them.
The Bible tells us in so many that within the Body of Christ there is to be complete unity. But how is this possible when we’re all so different? Simple: love. We all qualify on account of the same thing: love (of God). And we are all callled to relate to everyone in the same way: love (mirroring what God showed us). While political parties are formed over a common stance on issues, churches are built on relationship. Relationship isn’t a means to an end; it’s an end unto itself.
So maybe you think Bill Johnson’s the best thing since sliced bread, maybe you want John Piper to be your dad. Maybe both. That’s totally cool! Just don’t distance yourself from others or put people in categories on account of what they do or don’t subscribe to. If they love Jesus, they’re your brother or your sister. Treat them as such!
Want more?…
Listen to:
Phil’s talk – Heaven’s Relational Government (23/01/11)
Sarah’s talk – Favouritism Forbidden (13/02/11)



